Employer of Record

Hire in a new country in days. Own the entity when it makes sense.

Employer of Record puts people to work in a market where you have no legal presence. HSP Group arranges and manages the employment, watches the tax position as the country grows, and stands up your own entity at the point that costs less than staying on EOR.

A team hired in a new market within days
Your markets · 9 live
SpainSpainOwn entity
PolandPolandOwn entity
BrazilBrazilOn EOR
JapanJapanReview due
+5 more markets
Time to first hire
days
rather than the weeks an entity registration takes
SpainFirst hire to owned entity · Spain
Market assessed
People start
Tax reviewed
Entity formed
Payroll migrated
Contracts novated, benefits matched 28 Oct

Teams built for

The part that happens after EOR stops working.

Around 20 to 30% of EOR clients outgrow the arrangement every year, and for most providers that is where the relationship ends. Three things change when the same supplier covers both sides of that line.

Hire in days, without a legal entity

Employment, payroll and statutory benefits go live in the target country without a registration in place. You skip the cost, risk and complexity of entity setup and build the team before committing infrastructure to the market.

One supplier, from the first hire to the owned entity

Entity management, payroll, HR, accounting and tax in 100+ countries is what HSP has done for years, so reaching the entity stage is a step in the plan rather than a supplier change. No re-onboarding, no second procurement exercise.

Your tax position reviewed as you grow

EOR removes the requirement for an entity. It does not necessarily remove corporate tax exposure, and nothing tells you when per-employee fees have crossed the point where your own entity costs less. We review both as headcount and tenure build.

One supplier, from the first hire to the owned entity

Reaching the entity stage is a step in the plan, not a supplier change.

For most providers the relationship ends at the point you outgrow it, and the entity work goes out to procurement. Here it is the next thing the same team does, with the employment history already in the system the employee is moving into.

  • Entity formation, local registrations and registered agent, with tax structuring and the permanent establishment position
  • Payroll migration, contract novation and employee communications handled together rather than in sequence
  • Benefits matched closely enough that employees notice the payroll change and little else
While you are on EOR
Employmentarranged and managed
Payrollrun in country
Benefitsstatutory and supplemental
Entitynot required
→
Once you own the entity
Employmentyour contracts
Payrollmigrated, same team
Benefitsmatched to what they had
Entityformed and maintained
The crossover is the point of the page
20–30%of EOR clients across the market outgrow the arrangement each year
No re-onboardingthe employment history is already in the system the employee moves into
A team that began on EOR and moved onto an owned entity
Your tax position reviewed as you grow

EOR removes the entity requirement. It does not always remove the exposure.

Three situations decide whether EOR is the right structure for a market, and all three are tested per country before anything is signed rather than discovered eighteen months in.

  • Where headcount, tenure and spend reach the point that your own entity costs less and gives you more control
  • Where the jurisdiction restricts third-party employment for the roles you are hiring
  • Where the work your people do creates a permanent establishment anyway, so EOR is not removing the exposure you expected it to
Still right for the market
Headcountlow, or testing
Tenureshort or uncertain
Role typepermitted locally
Activityno taxable presence
?
Time to own it
Headcountfees exceed entity cost
Tenurepeople are staying
Role typerestricted on EOR
ActivityPE triggered anyway
Tested per country, before anything is signed
You get toldwhen the maths changes, not when the renewal comes round
Reviewing the tax position as a market grows
How it works

Four stages, from first hire to owned entity.

01
We assess whether EOR is right for the country

Before anything is signed: the restrictions in that jurisdiction, the permanent establishment position, and the point at which an entity becomes better economics. Where EOR is the wrong structure, we say so and set out the alternative.

02
Your people start working, usually within days

Employment, payroll and statutory benefits go live without an entity in place, with contracts drafted to local law and contributions withheld and remitted from the first cycle.

03
We watch the tax position as the country grows

As headcount, tenure and spend build, we review permanent establishment triggers and work out when the entity should happen. You get told when the maths changes.

04
We stand up the entity when the numbers say so

Entity formation, tax structuring, payroll migration and HR consulting, with benefits matched closely enough that employees notice the payroll change and little else.

One agreement, with HSP, covering the interim hiring and whatever the entity position becomes later.

Proof

Impel moved off EOR and onto its own entities.

Impel needed to grow internationally and then own the operations it had built. HSP handled both stages: the interim employment that got them into market, and the entity work that followed.

“From the very beginning, HSP demonstrated a deep understanding of what it takes to stand up international operations — from transitioning employees off an EoR model to helping us establish compliant, fully operational legal entities.”

Tom McNerney, Chief Human Resources Officer, Impel

“Their centralised management approach, with a single point of contact, has integrated our employment processes. Especially HSP's flexibility regarding Ingersoll Rand's high-speed processing of hirings is an absolute win for us.”

Markus Wührer, LL.M., Senior Manager Payroll, Compensation and Benefits EMEIA, Ingersoll Rand

What the solution covers.

Employment and compliance

Locally compliant employment contracts, offer letters and variations, in-country employment law adherence, worker classification guidance, termination support and offboarding, country-specific regulatory monitoring.

Payroll and benefits

In-country payroll processing and payslips, tax withholding and statutory remittance, social security and contribution management, statutory and supplemental benefits administration, consolidated multi-country invoicing.

Onboarding and employee experience

End-to-end new hire onboarding, employee self-service, HR briefings and employee communications, background check and documentation coordination, ongoing employee query support.

HR advisory on every engagement

Employee handbooks and HR policies, benefits benchmarking by market plus sourcing and implementation, grievance and disciplinary process support, leave and absence management, collective bargaining agreement assessments, statutory termination and redundancy guidance, expatriate and mobility support.

The move to your own entity

Entity formation, local registrations and registered agent, tax structuring and the permanent establishment position, payroll migration, contract novation and employee communications, benefits matched against what employees had before, statutory accounts and the ongoing compliance calendar.

GateWay

HSP’s global expansion management platform holds your entities, payroll, HR and tax work in one place, with a single view whether a person is employed under the EOR arrangement or through your own entity. This counts most at the transition, when the entity and the filings are already in the system the employee is moving into.

Questions we get asked.

When is an Employer of Record the wrong choice?

Three situations come up most often. When headcount, tenure and spend in a market reach the point where your own entity costs less and gives you more control. When the jurisdiction restricts third-party employment for the roles you are hiring. And when the work your people do in the country creates a permanent establishment anyway, so EOR is not removing the exposure you expected it to. We test all three per country before anything is signed.

How quickly can someone start?

Days rather than the weeks or months an entity registration takes. The exact answer depends on the country’s requirements and how quickly employee documentation comes together, so we give a market-specific answer during the assessment.

Do we have to end up with an entity?

No. Plenty of countries never justify one, and staying on EOR indefinitely is a perfectly good answer. We keep the position under review so you know when the economics change, not so you get moved for the sake of it.

We already have an EOR provider. Can you still help?

Yes, and you do not have to move the employment. HSP delivers entity management, payroll, HR and accounting behind other providers’ EOR arrangements, which is often right when an incumbent contract has time left to run. We review whether the setup is compliant, monitor the permanent establishment position, and handle the entity work when the country reaches that point.

What happens to employees when we move off Employer of Record?

They move onto your payroll. We novate the contracts, match benefits against what they had before, and handle the communications. For most people it amounts to a change of payslip and nothing more.

Can we use EOR in some countries and our own entities in others?

Yes, and most clients past a certain size do. Both sit in GateWay under one engagement, so the footprint is managed as one thing rather than two.

180+

countries where EOR is available

100+

countries with entity, payroll, HR and tax delivered by HSP

1

supplier, from the first hire to the owned entity

Tell us which markets you are hiring into.

We will assess whether EOR fits each one, and what your own entity would cost by comparison.

An EOR specialist replies within one business day. No sales sequence.